”And the argument on this thread by a proID poster that: they ought to teach ID because they already teach gay classes, fisting, and Harry Potter(?)....well hell, I can't argue with that. If those are the standards you all are holding ID to, I'd say it fits in just swell”
But if you say that, you degrade your own character as well as the character your part of this debate. That is, you appear unable to have momentarily abandoned the use of logic.
Intelligent Design does not fit in with those topics (I would say it differs infinitely). The difference is right in front of you. The topics you mention are of a nature quite simple and easy to define. (They are crude, disgusting and ridiculous and I will demolish any argument of those who disagree. I never met a Marcuse or a Derrida I couldn’t crush in debate.)
On the other hand, ID has inspired many highly sophisticated discussions like parts of this one, involving the exploration of topics such as linguistics, biology, genetics, ecology, theoretical physics, calculus, metaphysical philosophy, religion and epistemology.
Teach a worthy subject like Intelligent Design instead of the ridiculous ones that pervade our current public school system. Replace some of the garbage with something good like ID.
(correction to post 477)
That is, you appear to have momentarily abandoned the use of logic.