[Timmy]

And what's with this *goatheader* crap? Something to do with your personal obsession?

My posts to you on 8/21/05 concerning another evo thread, where you were too scared to give us your scholarly background:

So, Carolinaguitarman. What's your background? Running the Museum of Natural Science, or goatherding? 'Course, you seem to think it doesn't matter. You're simply anointed. Step up, my man. What's your background?

You refused, claiming you were too smart for me. I then replied . . .

"LOL. I never doubted it. So, we are just to believe some guy on the internet who calls himself Carolinaguitarman, and who won't even state his authority as to why we should listen to him? You see, oh great [self] anointed one, maybe we're not quite so stupid as you believed. On that, I'm going to bed. Cheers.

Therefore, I only thought it appropriate to dub thee "Goatherder," as that is the likely level of your qualifications to debate this topic. [You're really bad at it.]

[CarolinaGuitarman]

" You refused, claiming you were too smart for me. I then replied . . ."

I am, though I doubt I said that was the reason. More than likely I just brushed you off as a buffoon.

"Therefore, I only thought it appropriate to dub thee "Goatherder," as that is the likely level of your qualifications to debate this topic. [You're really bad at it.]"

And the name I give you would get me banned. :)

Too bad you couldn't actually debate my arguments instead of what you suppose my qualifications must be. You DO understand the logical fallacy you are engaging in, don't you? :)