So are you also willing 'to use Second Amendment rights to protect First Amendment rights from traitors', traitors defined as those who insist on a scientific explanation of origins?
So, are you willing to posit an actual questiion, or do you simply plan to keep trying your deflective pompassity? Your premise is faulty. There is no winner by default.
I have a theory. You have a theory. God will let us know who wins! In the end, it doesn't really matter, except to some of us, who believe in a future eternity. Apparently you don't.
You want to be the authority. You're not. You're just another crackpot that wants to play at being a god... and deny His existence. Go sit in your ivory tower, if you think it will keep you safe.
If you choose not to believe something, you have the right. Just don't expect everybody else to accept your own beliefs. As one who posits his trust in science, then secience will keep your bones.
Some people do think with their hearts. That is the essence of Christian morality. It is defined by a higher calling, only heard by those, with an affinity for God's Spirit. Calling us mystics, or relating our beliefs to a misunderstanding of science, is an affront to an awful lot of like-minded people. I guess that is the way a professor might look at things, from his high and lofty perch.
You can keep restating your amoral relativism, methinks. It's irrelevant, to me!