[Rudder]

He repeatedly uses the word "dumb" because he lacks an argument.

Well, I think he did a reasonable job of writing an essay that only required one word: "Dumb."

Let's face it squarely. ID says nothing except that the universe was invented.

Proof? None. Evidence? none.

What's to argue? Either it was or it wasn't. Who the hell knows? Can science provide the answer? No. Does science pretend to provide the answer? No.

Does ID provide an answer? Yep. The universe was someone's invention. End of debate (and intellectual inquiry.)

[Tenacious 1]

That is a fine intellectual inquiry and it is true. Like it or not, where science fails to provide answers, is where theory and faith reside.

[Cicero]

Evidently you are too closed minded to read any of their work.

[goldstategop]

The problem with ID theory is there is no way to empirically verify its claims. With evolutionary theory, you have testable claims that show whether you can disprove it. To date no one has been able to falsify evolution as the key concept in our understanding of the organization of life on earth.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")