Actually, no. I've made my point several times. If intelligent design is going to be taught in the schools as an alternative scientific theory, then what are it's underpinnings? How does the theory reconcile defects in the world around us?
The theory, as I understand it, posits that the design of the universe -- well, I think it's best of those who espouse the theory and understand it better than I do would define it.
The underpinnings of intelligent design are science.
Scientist have observed order and concluded that it is not chaos and not properly explained by randomness. This is the predominate view throughout all of science-- when one observes order we presume design or intention.
It is only in the radical Darwinian community is there an adamant faithful insistence upon order must be caused by randomness.