To: Leapfrog
Perhaps because when a problem is found, we fix it right away?
Again, why are there more vulnerabilities found in the open source code? If security-through-obscurity doesn't work, then you would expect an equivalent number of vulnerabilities in closed source systems. But that doesn't seem to be happening...
12 posted on
11/07/2005 6:18:49 PM PST by
Bush2000
(Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
To: Bush2000
But that doesn't seem to be happening... I disagree. Your OS is not in my server room because it is unreliable. This goes directly to the heart of your "vulnerabilities" argument.
13 posted on
11/07/2005 6:21:14 PM PST by
Michael Goldsberry
(an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
To: Bush2000
BTW, I'm more a Solaris/HP-UX/AIX guy than Linux.
14 posted on
11/07/2005 6:23:46 PM PST by
Michael Goldsberry
(an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
To: Bush2000
I've been inside the beast. I know what's its like. MS does not believe in QA or testing. The most shocking thing I encountered was the total lack of engineering discipline.
63 posted on
11/09/2005 7:20:19 PM PST by
Utopia
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson