Why is it that you guys must be so dishonest in every bloody exchange down to the last of you!
It isn't about Science or the Scientific method. It is about what you twits constantly wish to claim in it's regard. You want all the praise for what Science has accomplished and want to make excuse after bloody excuse for it's manifold failures.
It is a sum total that is the problem. What is asked is if you don't know "SHUT UP". It isn't that difficult.
If you want to be a fiction writer, go make your bones writing fiction. Science is not a fiction mill; but, that's what evolutionists have turned it into. Shut up. When you have something, speak. Until then shut up.
It is a sum total that is the problem. What is asked is if you don't know "SHUT UP". It isn't that difficult.
If you want to be a fiction writer, go make your bones writing fiction. Science is not a fiction mill; but, that's what evolutionists have turned it into. Shut up. When you have something, speak. Until then shut up
I think that you have failed to see the fullness of my point. I reduced your argument to the absurd by taking it and running with it to its extreme. You want to pick and choose what parts of science you believe? OK, I showed you what science has given you and what you would be without science.
You want to demolish parts of science because you don't like the results. You are willing to destroy the scientific method, and people's trust in that method on the way. I prefer not to see this happen.
As far as fiction, well some of my colleagues thought my dissertation some 20+ years ago was fiction, but you know, not a one of them told me to shut up. Since then a lot of it has been confirmed.
And I took their advice to heart. My first novel should be on the racks within the year. But its fiction, so don't pay it no mind.
Evening, all.