Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
Specifically? You're right. It's not there. (Hoo boy.)

What's the "(Hoo boy)" comment for? Had a court ruled that Congress did not have such authority, do you really think there would have been a problem with passing a Constitutional amendment to rectify the situation?

210 posted on 11/05/2005 3:09:03 PM PST by supercat (Don't fix blame--FIX THE PROBLEM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
"What's the "(Hoo boy)" comment for?"

Because you're looking for something in the Constitution that gives Congress the authority over airspace and airwaves, and I said that wording wasn't there, so I guess that means Congress can't do it, huh?

Never mind that Chief Justice (and Founding Father) John Marshall ruled in Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824) that navigation in coastal waters was commerce and could be regulated by Congress. I'm sure he meant to restrict his ruling to water navigation ... not air, or rail, or road, or internet.

THAT'S the reason for the "Hoo boy". .

270 posted on 11/06/2005 8:14:48 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson