Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: mlc9852

"there are two obvious problems with radioactive dating for geological purposes: 1) uncertainty about the composition of the original sample and 2) possible losses of material during the time span of the decay."

The original composition question is the bigger issue but it introduces uncertainty of only a few percent. Radioactive dating correlates almost perfectly with items where the age is known for some other reason - like things made in Roman times and stamped with a date.

Since Radioactive dating places the age of some rocks in the billions of years a small percentage error (or even a large percentage error) would still have the age in the billions of years.

And unlike evolution this is something that can be done in a lab and the technique can be taught in an afternoon.

The only way I have ever heard to reconcile this with the bible is that God purposely set out to test out faith by making billions of different objects all have the radioactive signature of being much old - it would have to be a deliberate and large scale trick by God.


93 posted on 10/23/2005 11:28:09 AM PDT by gondramB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: gondramB

Things made in Roman times don't go back billions of years.


98 posted on 10/23/2005 11:34:33 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

I didn't realize the Bible stated how old the earth is. Where is that information, please?


104 posted on 10/23/2005 11:41:57 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson