Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: TheRobb7
If you look at the underlying current in each point of view, you will see that the discussion is a thin veil over the real issue: morality.

Morality and all of its associated concepts are from the belief that some higher power is defining what is correct for human behavior. Today, “morals” are a religious pagan philosophy of esoteric hobgoblins where transfiguration is from pantheons of fantasies as the medium of infinitization. Others get derision for having an unwavering Judaic belief in Yahweh or Yeshua, although their critics will evangelize insertion of phantasmagoric fetishisms into secular law.

Plato’s Euthyphro is a great illustration. Socrates advances the argument to Euthyphro that, piety to the gods, who all want conflicting devotions and/or actions from humans, is impossible. (Socrates exposed the pagan esoteric sophistry.)

Likewise, morals are such a construction of idols used by the Left as a rationale for them to demand compliance to their wishes in politics, which most often are a skewed mess of fallacies in logic. “Morals” are a deceptive replacement for the “avoidance of sin.”

But since we are all properly obeying * the modern interpretation * of the First Amendment... Good or bad isn’t the question. Good, bad, right, wrong, evil, moral: all of these are purely religious. Morality and all of its associated concepts are based on the belief that some higher power is defining the correctness of human behavior. * The First Amendment says that Government must exorcise all traces of religion and theism from itself. * (The “modern interpretation.”) Therefore, the Government should never consider issues of morality and of right and wrong. Excuse the sarcasm...

Therefore, it becomes a question of benefits versus costs, not a question of right and wrong. Fetus killing has its benefits to society, especially if you like to sleep late on Saturday. However, it also has its costs as well. Society (by which I mean whoever manages to seize power) needs to evaluate these costs and decide accordingly.

31 posted on 10/23/2005 6:35:16 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Francis Dashwood

"Fetus killing has its benefits to society, especially if you like to sleep late on Saturday. However, it also has its costs as well. "

Contraception is a lot cheaper, and no one has to die.

...and you STILL get to sleep late. ;)


33 posted on 10/23/2005 6:39:48 AM PDT by TheRobb7 (The American Spirit does not require a federal subsidy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: everyone; Sir Francis Dashwood
Sir Francis Dashwood wrote:

* The First Amendment says that Government must exorcise all traces of religion and theism from itself. *

The First Amendment says that Congress shall make no law respecting the [differing & divisive] establishments of religions.

The religion clauses were designed in significant part to try to temper religious disputes: -- The social dissension that grows out of the fact that people have different religions.
Thus, it is not necessary for governments to 'exorcise all traces', but to just avoid backing specific beliefs, -- those that divide us.

81 posted on 10/23/2005 11:17:11 AM PDT by faireturn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson