No silly, what I am saying is we are going to teach kids that science has rules (the scientific method) and we are going to follow the rules and try to prove/disprove ID or evolution equally based on observation instead of being hypocrites and teaching only one viewpoint and trying to fight the others scientific observation in a court of law instead of a laboratory.
But then, studying the opposition to the observation that the earth was round would show the same pattern, the flat earthers resorted to the courtrooms instead of science and delayed though did not stop the scientific advancement of the day.
The same thing is going to happen now, because science in the end continues to advance, despite doctrine.
"But then, studying the opposition to the observation that the earth was round would show the same pattern, the flat earthers resorted to the courtrooms instead of science and delayed though did not stop the scientific advancement of the day."
What people used the courtrooms to argue a flat Earth? In the past 2,000 years I mean.