"Trying to disparage Miers by comparing her to Roberts is absolutely a low thing to do. "
Ok, it's disparaging miers to say her judicial philosophy should be pro-constitution like roberts said his was, and not "pro business" like you wanted it to be?
And then you ping the operator of this site in what, and attempt to bully me into stopping?
What a strange, sad world you must live in.
I want what I'm pretty sure the operators of this site want, since I've read their mission statement many times. I want a a justice who will be there to defend the sanctity of the constitution, not the interests of business or government or anything else. Just the constitution.
And to make it easier for everyone to understand, I cited the example of what Roberts said in his testimony (and everybody here applauded when he said it) - and you call that trolling?
Because why, I disagree with you and made your desire for a pro-business justice look petty?
I'm sorry, that's just pathetic. And I'm sorry for Jim Robinson being pinged by you every time you disagree with someone enough.
You're behaving like a TROLL who tried to disparage Miers by comparing her to Roberts.
I never attempted to compare the two. They were both nominated by the same man. You keep wanting to discredit Miers for not being like Roberts. That's TROLL behavior.
I like the fact that Miers has a business background. I like the fact that Roberts provided such a great education on constitutional law.
But I will never stoop to act like the democrats are acting, like you have done.
And no it's not bullying. It's sharing insights into the behavior of a TROLL, for the good of FR.