Replies

Think back to the roberts hearing. This is where I'm coming from.

I predicted long ago that the left would attempt to cast the next nominee, whoever it would be, in a bad light by comparing the next nominee to Roberts.

I never expected FReepers to do it. That's just low, and very revealing as to your motives.

Do we need FReepers who will assail this nominee for not being as good as the first nominee?

Do we need FReepers who will assail this nominee for not being as good as the first nominee?

We need ALL FReepers. That's why this is the United States of America...and that's why this is called FREE Republic.

There are many dictatorships I can direct you to across the globe where dissent is not allowed.

Jim Robinson's world is a shining testimony to stirring debate and a living, breating representative democracy.

" I predicted long ago that the left would attempt to cast the next nominee, whoever it would be, in a bad light by comparing the next nominee to Roberts.

I never expected FReepers to do it. That's just low, and very revealing as to your motives. "

That is right now one of cheapest posts I have seen here.

It has nothing to do with what I posted, and everything with you trying to slam me.

Apparently you can't answer it, or it doesn't fit with your ridiculous "I want a pro business justice" stance.

A supreme court justice should not be pro business or pro government. They should be pro constitution. That should be their bias. And because I pointed out that is what roberts said and I agree with it, you latch on to that like it's some sort of liberal thing.

Hello? Disconnect much?

And what's with pigning bothering Jim Robinson on that? Want to let him know there's a troll on the board that wants to constitution to be the first priority of a supreme court justice?!?!? THE HORROR!