Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unpatched Firefox flaw may expose users
ZDNet ^ | September 9, 2005, 3:53 AM PT | Joris Evers

Posted on 09/09/2005 9:43:47 AM PDT by Bush2000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: postaldave

No Im one of those that believes while all systems are vulnerable, they are not euqally so. I guess someone wrote a virus for a phone that had a market share of 20,000 people because they thought it was the size of MS right?


41 posted on 09/09/2005 4:24:01 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator
Thought this might be of interest to you.

Yes, as you know, I am extremely opposed to hackers open sourcing exploit code onto the internet prior to a vendor-created patch being available. Also as you know, many open source proponents right here on this site condone the practice as being a legitimate security process. Bottom line, users are now exposed to exploit with no patch available. But since it's an open source application to begin with, they're not going to get much sympathy.

42 posted on 09/09/2005 5:55:53 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3; postaldave

Actually you're right, but not for the reason you think. Once again, DHS reported many more holes in Unix/Linux than Windows in this week's summary of security flaws.

http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/bulletins/SB05-250.html

Check the archives if you doubt it.


43 posted on 09/09/2005 5:58:54 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

if i'm on the same side as you golden eagle i must be wrong.(grin)

i'm one of the few in the world that likes both OSs and don't believe all the BS coming from either group good or bad.

if one man made it there will always be some 13 year old punk out there ready to break into it.


44 posted on 09/09/2005 6:36:57 PM PDT by postaldave (dont ask me, i'm just a simple post birth, tissue mass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: postaldave
if one man made it there will always be some 13 year old punk out there ready to break into it.

Obviously. What we have to watch out for is those that claim their choice of O/S has fewer holes when the actual evidence proves the opposite. They are apparently willing to put us in peril simply to push their choice of software on us.

45 posted on 09/09/2005 7:06:34 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

once again i ask you GE why are you hell bent against linux. people who follow these threads might be about listen to you if you where to explain your motives. the godfather(rush) has a saying, "follow the money" one can only asume your a microsoft higher up to understand your jihad against linux.

care to explain???


46 posted on 09/09/2005 7:15:11 PM PDT by postaldave (dont ask me, i'm just a simple post birth, tissue mass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Ferris reported the bug to the Mozilla Foundation on Sunday, intending to go through the organization's bug-reporting process, he said. However, in an example of the uneasy alliance between security researchers and software makers, he decided to publicly disclose the flaw after a run-in with Mozilla staff, he said.

This must be all lies! LIES! LIES! I tell you. ONLY Microsoft would do such a thing as piss off a security expert trying to help them fix their product. I'm sure this really isn't a firefox issue and rather it's 100% Microsoft's fault. And besides even if this was a firefox issue, IE is horrible. Oh ya, get a MAC it's *nix and it's secure. Yeah, that's it, we OSS guys gave up on Firefox and now are going with MACs. {/sarcasm}

47 posted on 09/09/2005 7:30:10 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
Some people get joy out of trolling and some out of watching flame wars that trolls start. People who want to discuss things are neither of the above.

That's funny because that description fits you to a T.

48 posted on 09/09/2005 7:33:38 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
The good side to this, though, is that with OSS, the patches are released much sooner than their counterparts in proprietary software.

I guess that comment doesn't apply to this article. Notice it says UNPATCHED. That means a patch doesn't exist yet.

49 posted on 09/09/2005 7:35:03 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: postaldave
IMO:the reason linux has less security problems.

good point about not installing pirated software, but Linux actually has more vulnerabilities than Windows (lately).

50 posted on 09/09/2005 7:37:17 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: postaldave

Sure. There's known radical leftists behind GNU/open source software, beginning with the "father of free software" Richard Stallman. The GNU group even has its own "Manifesto" and claims its goals are to make all software free, a move that would destroy the US software industry. Communist governments the world over all start getting this free software and like it so much they start passing laws requiring their governments to use it, Cuba, China, Vietnam, etc. Now we have the DNC here in the US committing to it and trying to pass laws here in the US as well.

Check my posting history the last few days, I've given lots of links backing all this up, just like I always have. It's a leftist plot, pure and simple. Sure, it has some practical advantages to those who want their software for free, but that doesn't take away from its leftist origins and goals of its primary supporters.


51 posted on 09/09/2005 7:38:12 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: postaldave

Pretty soon N3WBI3 and the OSS crowd will switch to touting MACs. Beat them up on Linux they go to MACs, beat them up on MACs they go to Linux. Beat them up on both they call you names.


52 posted on 09/09/2005 7:38:31 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

Guess what else I heard? When Clinton was in the WH they were pushing Linux. Then Bush came in and they signed a big M$ contract. Not saying the WH dropped linux, but it is definitely less of a push today at the WH then it was when Clinton was there.


53 posted on 09/09/2005 7:41:53 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce; postaldave
The good side to this, though, is that with OSS, the patches are released much sooner than their counterparts in proprietary software.

I'm sure it's fashionable in your crowd to claim those things, but studies have proven them to be bogus, and it's been pointed out to you before. Still don't want to believe it? Try linuxsecurity.com as a reference:

A new study from Forrester Research has concluded that the Linux operating system is not necessarily more secure than Windows. The report, Is Linux more secure than Windows? finds that on average, Linux distributors took longer than Microsoft to patch security holes...

postaldave - I also don't like habitual liars.

54 posted on 09/09/2005 7:49:23 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Wow, no wonder they get mad at you. You make them eat their words.

That's gotta hurt.

55 posted on 09/09/2005 7:52:26 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
Wow, no wonder they get mad at you. You make them eat their words.

LOL, they should, but watch, even though I blew his claim straight to hell he'll try to deny it, start calling me names, then his buddies will come along start enlarging and bolding their fonts while calling me names, all trying to change the subject and smear my character instead of admitting their claim was BS. No problem, everybody with a brain knows they're losers and have to resort to those tactics when the facts don't back them up, and that's all I care about.

56 posted on 09/09/2005 8:00:05 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
I guess that comment doesn't apply to this article. Notice it says UNPATCHED. That means a patch doesn't exist yet.

Workaround XPI right here...

Download, drag over into your Firefox window, you're secure again. Patch should be released tomorrow.
57 posted on 09/09/2005 8:06:13 PM PDT by kingu (Draft Fmr Senator Fred Thompson for '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
while calling me names........ everybody with a brain knows they're losers. i love how you put that in one sentence. LMAO
58 posted on 09/09/2005 8:11:09 PM PDT by postaldave (dont ask me, i'm just a simple post birth, tissue mass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: postaldave
Loser isn't a name, it's an accurate description. These are names, which is all they ever have to offer in the face of facts. As you have probably noticed, they sling them constantly in defense of their leftist movement, which is fine, it's obviously only further proof they're leftists.
59 posted on 09/09/2005 8:37:57 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Wow, so I have to apply two patches within 1 day. No thanks.


60 posted on 09/09/2005 8:48:34 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson