Your original assertion was thet Bill Clinton wanted pot legal.
I merely pointed out that you were wrong in your assertion.
Nobody in their right mind argues that smoking marijuana doesn't kill ambition
That is no more true than saying that alcohol kills ambition.
A chronic drunk has less ambition than someone who smokes pot on the weekends.
Ha hah, very funny. You put Clinton and Thomas in the same bag, you must have got ahold of that 'dro.
Why not, you have. You seem to believe that all pot smokers are evil. This simply points out that pot use goes across the board politically.
I would wager that just as many "conservatives" as "liberals" like to get high now and again.
My point exactly. You think the powder made him better? Funny, real funny.
The point is, it didn't make him worse.
Last time I checked, the President of the US has nothing to do with vice arrests.
A chronic drunk has less ambition than someone who smokes pot on the weekends.
Yeah, and a pot head who smokes on the weekends has no ambition till Monday.
The point is, it didn't make him worse.
A cranked up idiot is worse than a sober one. Newsflash cocaine impairs judgment and causes organic brain damage. What medicinal purpose would you conjure up for cocaine?
When the government properly discourages users from destroying their brains, no human rights are being violated. If a human does have a right to destroy himself, where does that right originate? If society does not give him that right, then who or what does?