Read it yourself -- in context.
"More than simply not granting that authority, it *explicitly* puts intrastate activity outside of federal authority."
Article I, Section 8 does not explicitly put any activity outside of federal authority. It grants powers.
Explain how the Commerce Clause is so explicit in placing intrastate activity outside of federal authority. Especially when the clause uses the phrase "among the several states", and does not even *explicitly* allow "interstate" regulation!
Looks *implicit* to me.
Thanks for providing the evidence that you misquoted me; what I said was, "They [the USSC] ruled that Congress may do so [regulate intrastate traffic under the Commerce Clause] to prevent hindrance to interstate traffic."
Explain how the Commerce Clause is so explicit in placing intrastate activity outside of federal authority. Especially when the clause uses the phrase "among the several states",
Exactly by using that phrase, it explicitly draws a boundary between intrastate and interstate activity and limits Congressional authority to the latter.
and does not even *explicitly* allow "interstate" regulation!
*snicker* More preposterous semantic games. You're running on fumes.