Cool it with the "regulating".
Laws written in accordance with the Necessary and Proper Clause of the U.S. Constitution regulating governing purely intrastate activity that "substantially affects" interstate commerce are unconstitutional, the FDR court's fabrications notwithstanding certainly constitutional.
Tell me why not, rather than making exceptions to what is.
They're not in accord with that clause because they're not proper.
regulating governing
More laughable semantic hairsplitting.