Since that post I've seen you refer to Genesis as 'a fairy tale'.........so don't hide behind "I never used the word Christian" garbage.
But thanks for reminding me why I rarely frequent these threads, Wild. There are icky people here.
But remember this. Without evolutionary philosophy preceding it, Darwin wouldn't have had a leg to stand on. So HE was the first one to use the non-scientific to come up with his own brand of philosophy disguised as science.
Them's the facts, Wild. Even if ID is religion posing as science, your guy did it first.
Serious mental problems..........yeah, that's meIf you believe my joke about bloodletting was intended to attack Christians or Christianity, then yes, it is.
Since that post I've seen you refer to Genesis as 'a fairy tale'.........so don't hide behind "I never used the word Christian" garbage.But you attacked me before that time with your bizarre "attacking bloodletting is attacking Christians" rant. Besides, Genesis is an interesting but highly implausible story. So the use of the term "fairy tale," while perhaps impolite, is appropriate. You disrespect others' beliefs, you cannot expect others to respect yours, can you. Or do you think that simply because you believe it, that it must be respected, even if you disrespect others?
But thanks for reminding me why I rarely frequent these threads, Wild. There are icky people here.There are, and they are known as "creationists."
But remember this. Without evolutionary philosophy preceding it, Darwin wouldn't have had a leg to stand on. So HE was the first one to use the non-scientific to come up with his own brand of philosophy disguised as science.Wow. Ignorance in two branches of human endeavor at once.
Them's the facts, Wild. Even if ID is religion posing as science, your guy did it first.Unbelievable. You do nothing but push your religious mumbo-jumbo and try to teach it in public schools and when people object, you have the gall to turn around and say that other people are being religious? You're pitiful.