re: post 915
I would be cautious about the "revision" of the key in this post re Shango
If for no other reason than the absurdity and obvious US political imlication of changing the original key from:
*Arawaks=native Arubans
*Arawak King=Prime Minister, or possibly the boat with the same name from the mainland that frequents Aruba.
to CIA and President Bush, respectively.
The "arawaks" are the indian tribe from the SA mainland who originally populated the island.....to now change the key to Shangos post as above in post 915 is ulterior, and there may well be other changes equally suspicious.
Oh...I wasn't suggesting any changes. As a matter of fact I spent a lot of time on the Shango post early on. Sometimes it sounds to me like someone with a very active imagination and a flare for prose. Other times I wonder how close to the truth it is and if the person posting it has been located and questioned.
I'm not totally casting it aside, though. As things are now it seems all theories still need to be considered.
respectfully,
Arawaks is a huge factor and throughout the context of the Shango chat, it fits that they are an investigate entity whose objective is to expose something much larger and sinister than the missing person's case. Shango is one of the Arawaks but he strongly implys that he is not on Aruba.
Natalee's family has had the info. for a long time about the magnitude of what's going on there. They have not zeroed in on the source, obviously. They are only missing a definative location of where their personal tragedy began.
I agree that it needs to be looked at VERY carefully .. I also have my suspicions that it's someone here in the US just making things up...
Mostly due to so many of the words in the "code" really relate to our "old west"... and the way it is written using words like teepee and wampum...
Just think it's someone looking for attention.