[ohioWfan]

But the results that you are presuming upon CAFTA are hypothetical, and therefore not acceptable argumentation against it.

In other words, you are supposing a result that you cannot possibly know will occur.

As to the 'same issue' thing...........you pinged me to a reply to my post where I said they were not the same issue, by saying they are intertwined (as though it somehow refuted my statement).

I was just clarifying my position, not attacking yours.

[Mr. Mojo]

But the results that you are presuming upon CAFTA are hypothetical

The two agreements are virtually identical in both principle and (proposed) implementation, and while that doesn't prove they'll yield the same (negative) results, it's a mighty strong indication.

you pinged me to a reply to my post where I said they were not the same issue by saying they are intertwined (as though it somehow refuted my statement).

Nope, I wasn't refuting your statement; I was merely adding to it.