Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: nairBResal

Yes, growth is real wages is another sign that NAFTA was a disaster.


394 posted on 07/28/2005 7:39:51 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot; nairBResal
Yes, growth is real wages is another sign that NAFTA was a disaster.

Do you think nairBResal would be surprised to know that real wages for all workers fell 8% in the decade before NAFTA was passed?

He may also be surprised to learn that we gained about 2 million construction jobs from 1994-2004, which paid well. In 2004, the average hourly wage for construction workers was $19.23 up from $14.38 per hour in 1994. Construction wages showed losses in the 1984-94 pre-NAFTA period.

Hourly Earnings for All Workers

I always thought construction was one of the industries the protectionists have said was a prime example of wage arbitration and the race to the bottom. Hmmmm. Could they be wrong about other things too?

401 posted on 07/28/2005 7:56:40 AM PDT by Mase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies ]

To: Toddsterpatriot

$0.06 x 40 x 52 = $124.80

$8.20 x 40 x 52 = $17056.00

$124.80 / $17056.00 = 0.7%

Only a PIMP could be proud of this kind of performance.


402 posted on 07/28/2005 7:57:29 AM PDT by nairBResal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson