(1) I find it hard to believe that terrorists have nuclear devices and they have not yet used them anywhere.
(2) No nuclear device they are capable of deploying could kill millions.
A dirty bomb, perfectly deployed, would probably be less lethal than 9/11.
(3) Nuking Mecca in response to a dirty bomb would result in (a) the complete and total ostracism of the US by every other nation in the world and (b) would be the catalyst of bin Laden's dream - it would probably result in Taliban-style governments overthrowing every secular Muslim state and would unify all the squabbling Arab governments against the US.
It would be a enormous strategic blunder.
The rational response to a dirty bombing would be a large-scale partial deportation of Muslims from the US and the swift execution of thousands of radical Muslim activists.
every secular Muslim state
What? Turkey?
All was prefaced with an "If"
I'm not saying to respond disproportionately. You may be right about terrorist nuke potential. I certainly hope you are. All I'm saying is that if they were able to detonate a powerful nuke, then we should feel free to respond in kind.
As to deporting Muslims: Yeah right. To the elite, pro-mass immigration forces in this country, nuking every Muslim city on the planet would be less radical than actually deporting people.
"The rational response to a dirty bombing would be a large-scale partial deportation of Muslims from the US and the swift execution of thousands of radical Muslim activists."
Nope.
Cook 'em.