Uh no, it means the link in my reply #68 of this thread, shows that tancredo's puppetmasters, the buchanans(pat and bay) are islamofacist appeaser's(ala neville chamberlain).
Perhaps you are not aware of coalitions being built on particular issues. Buchanan agrees with Tancredo on immigration (as do most Americans according to most polls), not the war in Iraq.
Tancredo's PAC deals primarily with border/imm issues.
"Uh no, it means the link in my reply #68 of this thread, shows that tancredo's puppetmasters, the buchanans(pat and bay) are islamofacist appeaser's(ala neville chamberlain)."
Let's go through this really slowly so you can understand it, because it's quite apparent that you're having a difficult time.
My initial comment that you responded to:
"Does "conservatism" involve open borders? LOL If so, count me out"
Your idiotic response:
" hillary gives many thanks for your and tancredo's kneejerkedness."
My response to your idiotic response:
"You can keep swallowing the RNC Kool Aid if you wish, how DARE a "vigilante" like myself wish for border control! Yeah, that's the ticket....the illegals just want to do "jobs americans wont do!"..."
Another idiotic response to my reply:
" "" Hmm tom tancredo's PAC bosses(pat and bay buchanan), say we should placate the islamofascists." See the link in reply #68."
(this link dealt with pat buchanan, who you call his "puppetmaster"..which i will prove false later on)
my response to your idiotic reply:
"That's a nice try of you....really it is. So show us how nuking mecca would "placate" the islamofascists? Also, that was a pathetic response...which means you can't defend the open borders policy."
yet another idiotic, dodging response of yours:
"Uh no, it means the link in my reply #68 of this thread, shows that tancredo's puppetmasters, the buchanans(pat and bay) are islamofacist appeaser's(ala neville chamberlain)."