Posted on 07/05/2005 9:37:54 PM PDT by Brian_Baldwin
You are exactly right on that one but I would just like to add one thing and that is:
"Illegals do the work for dirt cheap and the individuals that pay them under the table, only like them because of that."
I live in Upstate, NY and it goes on daily. I see one of the biggest oil providers up here picking up 12 South Americans from the train, in the morning.
More bizarre even than Souter’s alienation argument was Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s sweeping re-writing of American history in her concurring opinion in McCreary. “Those who would renegotiate the boundaries between church and state must therefore answer a difficult question: why would we trade a system that has served us so well for one that has served others so poorly,” O’Connor inquired.
The “system” here referenced (militant secularism) has been in effect for roughly 40 years of our nation’s 229-year history. Has it served us well? The system is arbitrary, capricious and inconsistent. (Scalia, “What distinguishes the rule of law from the dictatorship of a shifting Supreme Court majority is the absolutely indispensable requirement that judicial opinions be grounded in consistently applied principles.”)
Said “system” has led to decades of contentious, increasingly bitter, litigation. It was imposed from above, over the strenuous objections of the American people. It’s unconstitutional, anti-democratic, a denial of our history and heritage, and is based on a monumental lie – that any commingling of government and religion will result in civil strife.
I hope that another judge resigns soon.
There are better ways to get your point across. I don't respect someone who acts like this.
Methings Ms. Laura takes herself a bit too seriously.
I like chile....
Not sure what prompted you to comment as you did...But I dang well guarantee you..it's inappropriate.
FWIW-
Her legs looked a lot better than Ann Coulter's legs would have looked, as I remember. As far as getting ahold of the magazine, check Ebay.....I see someone has most of the mags from ;93 up for auction. (Although I don't at all remember what year it was from). Now I am interested in tracking it down. There IS a way to find out....I'll get back to you.
You would be a hero to all 'FReeper Ingraham Fans' if you could post that adorable picture of Laura in that leopard mini-skirt.
I shall use that line in the future to 'pepper' my conversations.
Okkay, Okay, BTS, I will make every effort to find my copy
of that issue (from '96, as I found out) , which I am quite sure I saved because of Atlas's article. THEN I will
scan the cover and THEN post the picture DIRECTLY TO YOU!
Though I really don't know how to post pix to FR. Bookmark me so you can inform me about that , if you know how. Also, I found out that nobody on Ebay is offering NYT mags from that year at all!
Okkay, Okay, BTS, I will make every effort to find my copy
of that issue (from '96, as I found out) , which I am quite sure I saved because of Atlas's article. THEN I will
scan the cover and THEN post the picture DIRECTLY TO YOU!
Though I really don't know how to post pix to FR. Bookmark me so you can inform me about that , if you know how. Also, I found out that nobody on Ebay is offering NYT mags from that year at all!
Danke.
Exactly. That is what the President was talking about. His comments are being taken out of context.
Speaking of "shotgun mouths," your comment is in as poor taste as this suspicious article.
I'm talking to people that registered as republicans for the first time this past year. They are South Park Conservatives and they are free market small government types. They see 9-11 as a wake-up call. And they are getting mighty angry with the Bush Family cozy up with Clintoons, allowing the borders to be floodgates, passing CFR and Medicaid entitlements. They also tell the McCains of the world to go scratch.
Bush will either stop being a liberal or he will surely be left to the liberals. One thing about SPConservatives is that don't give a hoot in a whirlwind about loyalties. And they hate sanctimonious elites wagging their fingers and shullbitting how we have to cowtow in civility.
IMO, Laura Ingraham is 100% correct. Either you listen or we allow the left to have their way. Getitgotitgood.
Sure she can be 100% correct in sentiment but not in execution.
Sorry, it was a bad day when I read it and responded.
Totally agree
People like that post worthless vanities just to see their words in black and white. I've seen numerous occasions where a poster will post a worthless vanity, and never bother to respond to those asking for clarification to the post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.