Yes, I heard an international law expert explain that Perjury is a charge under that system. So is being complicit in the commission of a crime. If I recall correctly, one of the more relevant pieces of evidence that the authorities have is a text message between Joran and HIS FATHER!! That message was sent and received the FIRST night.
That makes me think that the brothers did drop him off and then later he needed his father's help. I wonder if the alleged calls to the Kalpoes were to form an alibi. They wouldn't need to know that he and his fatehr were taking care of a mess. They would just think that Joran was walking home.
"Yes, I heard an international law expert explain that Perjury is a charge under that system. So is being complicit in the commission of a crime."
Maybe, then, what the judge meant when he stated that there wasn't any evidence that a crime had been committed and let the Kalpoe brothers go free while sending Joran back to jail, was that so far, while there certainly appears to be enough evidence to suspect that Joran MAY have committed a crime, until it's proven that he did, in fact, commit a crime, the Kalpoe brothers (or even the father) cannot be convicted of having been complicit in the commission of that crime. Short, non-confusing version: Ya can't be arrested for nor convicted of having been complicit in the commission of a crime if it hasn't been proven that the crime actually occurred.