HUh, based on MY description?? I didn't write anything to you until you wrote to somebody else that you wondered if she was calling for vigilante justice.
In fact, research shows that:
over30withabrain wrote to kcvl: "So is she suggesting some kind of vigilante justice here?"
Then I posted to you. Before that, I had said not a word. In my answer, I denied that she was calling for that, and I explained my reasoning.
I mistook you for kcvl, sorry. Since you both were addressing the same point to me, I forgot who said what. The fact remains I was asking if Beth was calling for citizens/countries to take matters in their own hands. BTW, I just heard what she said firsthand and not from another FReeper. And indeed what she says does cross the line. Unless she has incontrovertible proof that the brothers were indeed accessories to murder (PROOF, which we haven't heard so far, not hunches or gut feelings), she is wrong to call them criminals publicly, tie them to a murder, and ask entire nations to not allow them entry. Her grief and anxiety canoot be the driving force in this case, sorry. Again, let me emphasize her feeling are perfectly understandable, but they are HER feelings and should not be what everyone else acts on. This case needs proof, not accusations