The family basically accused him of negligent homocide and you don't understand why he's angry?
Actually it wasn't a negligent homicide, it was a very deliberate one.
"The family basically accused him of negligent homocide and you don't understand why he's angry?"
O.J. Simpson was "angry" also.
Terri's gravesite will now become a place to pilgrimage to, and a shrine. Mark my words. Michael would have been better off not burying her in FL where all the "supporters" will now parade to, giving Terri no peace even in her grave. I hope this doesn't happen, but I bet it will.
When he received 1.2 million dollars for the care and rehabilitation of their daughter and immediately cut-off all medical care and rehabilitative care and started proceedings to end her life, can you understand why they might be a tad upset as well?
Even his reasons for the lawsuit to gain that money have been proven false and he still will not account for exactly what happened that night.
The person is a cold, heartless bastard in the truest sense. If he really cared about anything but himself, there is no reason to keep her body from them or have her cremated against the religious tenets of her faith. If his real promise was to let her die peacefully, he wouldn't have made her starve and dehydrate to death, slowly over 2 weeks, forcing her parents to watch it powerless. If he had an ounce of decency, he would have at least given them her ashes for their greiving and gone on with his life and new new woman and children.
BTW. Any thoughts on why it was such a deep promise to her, but took him 7 years to even remember it?
I wonder if any of the posters on this thread are going to recognize that at least she's buried close to her parents.
Michael Schiavo always said it would be Pennsylvania, so I'll bet he did this for the sake of her parents. Do you think anyone is going to notice?
So that gives him the right to put something about himself on HER tombstone? I never heard of such a thing. Most people write things about the loved one who is buried not about themselves. I can not understand how anyone can defending this creep.
One has to consider the outside possibility that he did promise to unhook her from life support, should an unfortunate event arise.
It is reasonable to assume that the court system in fact DID believe that WAS his promise and obligation.
I often wonder if the folks who are so upset about terri, are equally vociferous about the right to express and have that will carried out, even if it is in writing beforehand?
I would like to see a poll on living wills, and courts carrying out their intent against the protests of other siblings, parents or spouses who disagree....
in other words, do the terri schiavo thread reflect a cutlural divide about the end of life, legal right to die and ending life support by artificial means, in the event of a legal document... not just in the 'he said she said' dynamic of the terri schiavo case?