[Howlin]

So, if their guardian decided that the best thing for them would be to end their life by shooting them in the head, that would be OK too?

And you all wonder why nobody takes anything you say with any credence?

At least make an ATTEMPT to keep in touch with the truth or reality.

[Spiff]

So, if their guardian decided that the best thing for them would be to end their life by shooting them in the head, that would be OK too?

And you all wonder why nobody takes anything you say with any credence?

At least make an ATTEMPT to keep in touch with the truth or reality.

You didn't answer my questions. And while we're throwing around belittling comments, let me toss it right back. Do you wonder why no one takes anything YOU say with any credence?

The reality of the situation is that Terri died because at the request of Terri's "guardian" Judge Greer, in his written court order, prohibited all hydration and nutrition until dead. If you don't believe me, go read the court order. If you don't have a link, I'll get it for you.

This is no different than if Judge Greer, at the request of Terri's "guardian", ordered that she be deprived of oxygen until dead and therefore a plastic bag was placed over her head and she suffocated.

It is no different than if Judge Greer, at the request of Terri's "guardian", ordered that she be administered one 9mm 115 gr. full metal jacket bullet to the base of her skull until dead.

The method of death doesn't matter. The fact is that she was executed by court order. Somehow, you and many others have found the dehydration/starvation method acceptable in her case. Why not the suffocation or even the bullet? In this case they're probably just as "legal" as any other method. What's the difference? She is still dead at the hands of her so-called guardian and the judge and you're still here defending it.