Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
No. Just stating that many of us believe that the sanctity of life supercedes the sanctity of marriage in a case such as this one.

We still believe that marriage is a sacred vow, but not when it comes to ending a life that the parents want to be spared.

I hope you understand that position.

764 posted on 06/15/2005 10:25:25 AM PDT by ohioWfan ("If My people, which are called by My name, will humble themselves and pray.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 709 | View Replies ]


To: ohioWfan; Howlin

The sanctity of marriage must be more than a one-sided thing which applies only to the declaration that a spouse would want to be dehydrated to death.

The husband here believed he could go on with a life with a girl friend, kids, etc., while at the same time deny her care to her parents by saying only he had the right to say what she would have wanted because he was a legal spouse/guardian.

Greer upheld that side of "marriage sanctity", but he ignored the statutes that disqualified the husband from Guardianship because of the husband's abandonment of the other side of "marriage sanctity".


838 posted on 06/15/2005 10:40:35 AM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 764 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson