Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Spiff
It certainly would have kept her more healthy in her current state

I guess you missed the part where he said there was NO NEGLECT, huh?

And how many times have the doctors been wrong about people never being able to improve and they miraculously did improve?

I have an honest question for you and all the rest:

Just how many people are you willing to call liars to convince yourselves you are right? Is there ANYBODY who isn't lying besides the Schindlers?

278 posted on 06/15/2005 8:48:29 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin

Amen. What this case proved to me is that if I stick to Conservative principles such as State's Rights, seperation of powers, I will be proven correct.


321 posted on 06/15/2005 8:55:23 AM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
Just how many people are you willing to call liars to convince yourselves you are right? Is there ANYBODY who isn't lying besides the Schindlers?

Even if the coroner's report is 100 percent accurate, that still does not justify killing Terri Schiavo by dehydration/starvation. Those things discovered in the autopsy were discovered AFTER she was killed. They were not sure BEFORE she was killed. We should always err on the side of caution that we're not killing a living, human being. If she had no feelings, no brain activity, she was blind, etc. WHAT DID IT HURT to allow her normal body processes to keep her alive!? Why did Michael aided and abetted by Judge Greer have to ACTIVELY put her to death by removing hydration and nutrition? Why!? Even with all of this evidence, no one can be sure that she was there or not. Her body continued to live on, albeit with aided hydration and nutrition. She was not on "life support" - she was alive and may have been functioning at some level undetectable by cutting her body open AFTER she'd been dehydrated/starved to death. This report actually proves a great number of people WRONG as they said over and over that she had NO brain and her brain cavity was only filled with cerebrospinal fluid. If she actually had a brain, there is a chance that there was some function.

But even beyond all of that, those of us who believe in protecting life believe that each person possesses a soul. Who is to say if Terri's soul was still intact or not until her body ceased functioning? Does the coroner's report include any data about that? Obviously not, but again we should err on the side of protecting life.

344 posted on 06/15/2005 9:00:03 AM PDT by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

>>Is there ANYBODY who isn't lying besides the Schindlers?<<

Father Pavone:

http://priestsforlife.org/euthanasia/pavoneletter.htm

He visited her repeatedly & is quite convinced that she was aware.


506 posted on 06/15/2005 9:33:39 AM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson