Exactly!
Yet even a surprising amount of (conservative?) FReepers will slam the judge for throwing out a case where the item in question was obtained by illegal search and seizure.
>>Yet even a surprising amount of (conservative?) FReepers will slam the judge for throwing out a case where the item in question was obtained by illegal search and seizure.<<
No reason to be alarmed. They are just getting prepared for Partiot Act II where being anything other than a sheep who follows orders will get you in trouble.
Can you explain exactly how this constitutes illegal search and seizure? The cop made a routine traffic stop, noticed something that made him suspicious, and found 33 pounds of cocaine. The cocaine confirms his suspicions were correct, thereby invalidating the illegal part of the search and seizure. Ya'll must have a lot of training in mental gymnastics to twist the Constitution into enough of a pretzel to imagine the founders intended people to walk free when they had committed a crime.