Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: crail
Oh, I see... you bolded the wrong part. Try this:

The problem with using the word ‘theory’ in this case is that scientists use it to mean a well-substantiated explanation of data.

It's just a theory, to scientists, according to AIG, is a well-substantiated expanation of data. When scientists admit the Theory of Evolution is just a theory, they mean what AIG says they mean.
70 posted on 05/12/2005 8:28:54 AM PDT by crail (Better lives have been lost on the gallows than have ever been enshrined in the halls of palaces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: crail
"...they mean what AIG says they mean."

well, I'm not sure youre using their words correctly, because they call using the term theory a problem. Scientists try to put Evolution on par with other well-known theories and expect us to simply accept it, when Evolution is not a proven fact. What AIG means is

It would be better to say that particles-to-people evolution is an unsubstantiated hypothesis or conjecture.

89 posted on 05/12/2005 8:43:00 AM PDT by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson