To: crail
Oh, I see... you bolded the wrong part. Try this:
The problem with using the word theory in this case is that scientists use it to mean a well-substantiated explanation of data.
It's just a theory, to scientists, according to AIG, is a well-substantiated expanation of data. When scientists admit the Theory of Evolution is just a theory, they mean what AIG says they mean.
70 posted on
05/12/2005 8:28:54 AM PDT by
crail
(Better lives have been lost on the gallows than have ever been enshrined in the halls of palaces.)
To: crail
"...they mean what AIG says they mean." well, I'm not sure youre using their words correctly, because they call using the term theory a problem. Scientists try to put Evolution on par with other well-known theories and expect us to simply accept it, when Evolution is not a proven fact. What AIG means is
It would be better to say that particles-to-people evolution is an unsubstantiated hypothesis or conjecture.
89 posted on
05/12/2005 8:43:00 AM PDT by
wallcrawlr
(http://www.bionicear.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson