To: crail
nope..i didnt miss it and i'm not going to pick and choose which ones i would disclose.
I simply added it to the discussion. click on the link, each of the sources use similar language when giving a definition.
it is what it is.
65 posted on
05/12/2005 8:21:44 AM PDT by
wallcrawlr
(http://www.bionicear.com)
To: wallcrawlr
it is what it is.
It is.... and it appears that what it is not is the definition "theory = belief" that you would like it to be. The very first definition is: "... repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena," which is clearly *not* synonymous with "belief."
69 posted on
05/12/2005 8:26:19 AM PDT by
crail
(Better lives have been lost on the gallows than have ever been enshrined in the halls of palaces.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson