Thank you! :-) You honor me.
However, the fact the subject of this article is crying "Censorship!" because she's not allowed to promote her book to a captive audience of school children suggests that she reasons at the "cow covered with pine needles" level.
Here is where I disagree. From the above article: "We just don't need that kind of debate" does lend itself to an air of censorship.
I disagree. If the purpose of the person's appearance was to teach writing (and why can't the regular teachers teach writing?), then introducing a disputed scientific topic produces no benefit for the school.
The writer is free to hawk her book at Wal-mart. Every major publication and media outlet presupposes "evolution," often at a "whale hopping on its tail" level of simplicity. Expanding the definition of "censorship" doesn't benefit anyone.