I understand your point. This article, though, was about a children's story book, not about a biologist-approved science text.
If you don't see many children's books, or children's TV programs, you might not be aware of how incoherent the presentation of "evolution" generally is.
I see what is posted here about evolution, so I know it isn't being taught in a coherent form.
I can think of three people on FR -- half a dozen at most -- who argue against something that resembles evolution as a biologist sees it. And even those people prefer to argue against a straw man made up of out-of-date statements, mostly things from popular books and articles, rather than argue against the best current journal publications.
If people want science teaching sharpened and brought up-to-date, I'm all for that.