Replies

my FRiend, it is ludicrous to imply that the term "any" would mean any court in the world, or even that the intention of the legislation was to include any court in the world.

Isn't it congress's job to codify their intent?

Isn't it congress's job to codify their intent?
Referring to post #70
I'm sure they would have if they had ever dreamed that this would even be in question. Some things just don't require saying. Much like the fabricated "separation of church and state" non-clause of the Constitution. At the time it was beyond reason that anyone would twist the 1st amendment to the extent that it had been twisted.
The mere fact that we are even having this conversation shows just how successful the globalist have been.

It is apparent that your opinion is firm, and that is ok. I rarely disagree so firmly with a fellow FReeper, but I really am speechless that this is even an issue.
With that I'll wish you well, hope you have a great day, and disengage from the conversation.

Cordially,
GE

PS: I've also GOT to get back to work!