To: stand watie; Non-Sequitur
(NOTE TO ALL: N-S himself ADMITTED that slavery was NOT the cause of the war on another thread.he stated that the WBTS was to "preserve the Union".)) Typcial double-talk.
The South divided the nation over slavery, the North went to war initially to preserve the Union.
To: fortheDeclaration
"The South divided the nation over slavery, the North went to war initially to preserve the Union."
And King George went to war with the States for the SAME REASON.
Does preservation of a union make a war Constitutional? Or even moral?
691 posted on
05/02/2005 7:22:33 AM PDT by
MacDorcha
(Where Rush dares not tread, there are the Freepers!)
To: fortheDeclaration
don't you WISH that you were correct??
even GEN Grant said that the war was ONLY to "preserve the union".
free dixie,sw
699 posted on
05/02/2005 8:43:50 AM PDT by
stand watie
(being a damnyankee is no better than being a racist. it is a LEARNED prejudice against dixie.)
To: fortheDeclaration
i note that N-S hasn't made a comment on this. he KNOWS what he said to ME.
free dixie,sw
700 posted on
05/02/2005 8:46:56 AM PDT by
stand watie
(being a damnyankee is no better than being a racist. it is a LEARNED prejudice against dixie.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson