Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

"What ruling, exactly? Surely not Scott v Sandford?"

I seem to recall NOT mentioning a ruling. I seem also to recall addressing that this was their LEVEL of awarenss in the world.


261 posted on 04/27/2005 9:59:28 AM PDT by MacDorcha (Where Rush dares not tread, there are the Freepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]


To: MacDorcha
I seem to recall NOT mentioning a ruling. I seem also to recall addressing that this was their LEVEL of awarenss in the world.

And I seem to recall your claiming that the average Bubba in the Civil War WAS complaining about the Supreme Court. So what decision or what actions of the court were they complaining about?

262 posted on 04/27/2005 10:02:12 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]

To: MacDorcha

And I would have thought Chrisholm v. Georgia first.

Just as a side-note.


264 posted on 04/27/2005 10:28:52 AM PDT by MacDorcha (Where Rush dares not tread, there are the Freepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson