Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Justice Ginsburg you should be asking but Chief Justice Marshall:

Justice Marshall in 1819 was a far cry from the Justice Marshal of the Virginia debates, where he opined that the states retained all powers not delegated, and could resume those powers.

But Justice Ginsberg Marshall writes, 'Why else were some of the limitations, found in the ninth section of the 1st article, introduced?' Duh, to LIMIT federal powers. Then he REVERSES the meaning of Amendment X, which reserves ALL powers not delegated nor prohibited to the states, to reserve all powers not EXPRESSLY delegated.

You have to remember, Chief Justice John Marshall is the hero to Wlat, the worshipper of Michael Moore, and Lincolnite that despises Presidents Bush (elder and son) and Ronald W. Reagan. In fact, Wlat never voted for a single Republican President. And if Walt wasn't tied up, he would probably come back and defend John Marshall - his liberal hero.

474 posted on 04/22/2005 1:51:39 PM PDT by 4CJ (Good-bye Henry LeeII. Rest well my FRiend. || Quoting Lincoln OR JimRob is a bannable offense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies ]


To: 4ConservativeJustices
Then he REVERSES the meaning of Amendment X, which reserves ALL powers not delegated nor prohibited to the states, to reserve all powers not EXPRESSLY delegated.

But that isn't what it says. Nowhere is the word expressly used.

475 posted on 04/22/2005 2:39:38 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson