You are thouroughly incorrect. My understanding of the law ia st least the equal of yours. The proper way to debate is to take issue with something I stated and prove it is wrong on the facts. Procaliming that I misunderstand the law or I am distorting an issue is simply that, a proclamation devoid of any basis in reason.
It will always be beyond those who believe this was a murder committed by a gigantic conspiracy.
Now you're lying. And I'll explain why I used the word lie. There is no basis in any of my posts referencing a "gigantic conspiracy". Why are you lying?
However those who actually care about the law and know there was NO conspiracy gigantic or otherwise but just the ordinary court work done in the same way every day throughout the world find nothing here "beyond them." Except perhaps the actions of the Schindlers.
Your entire post is nothing but lies, ad hominem and hubris. Totally unimpressed.
Justshut etc., making an effort to treat folks with respect, or at least with civility, both the smart and the savvy, and the dumb and the relatively ignorant, tends to pay great dividends, most of which accrue to oneself. Just a thought.
Since you believe there was a misapplication of the law or an ignoring of it this means you do NOT have an equal understanding of it.
If you do not believe in a conspiracy that is a welcome difference from most of your allies.
You're being "impressed" would indicate great weakness in my argument and would not be welcome.