In my opinion, it was equally cruel, if not more so, to disallow her therapy once she started improving, especially when the $$ was there to pay for the rehab. I don't understand why Michael didn't have the experimental implant removed according to the doctor's instructions. We are looking at this from two opposing points of view, and I doubt they will merge at this point.
I'm trying to be polite about this. I see we have a difference of opinion, and there's not much point continuing the discussion further. To do so would only cause more acrimony on these threads. That's not my intention.
I don't have much real information about what happened after the initial attempts at rehabilitation. But given the results of the CAT scan and other tests there was no hope. Once the process of degeneration sets in there is nothing likely to stop or reverse it short of divine intervention.
I appreciate you trying to get your point across without rancor or insults and just wish others would adopt that tactic. Having lost a beautiful wife (whom I loved beyond measure) to death I am in no way a "lover of death" nor one who would give up on someone without cause. It is not my evil nature (though there is enough evil within me) which makes me believe TS was beyond hope.
What is so hard for people to understand that starving someone to death for weeks is wrong? I know it is hard seeing someone you love in that condition but you must pray for strength. God will see you through it. I never want the cause of death to be listed as starvation on someone I love.