Greer broke many laws
and I ask simply for documentation of this unsubstantiated comment. What do I get in return? Another remark that I 'don't know the basics' and need to do my 'homework'. I'm sorry dearie, but if you look at my previous posts beginning in the 400s, I have done my homework and know the facts (although I realize they don't apparently matter)
Oh, and of course, a non-response to my request for the laws that Greer 'broke'. Expected nothing less. I agree with CS. At one time, you could expect a valid well thought out response on threads that dealt with issues like this. However, apparently a valid response has now devolved to random rantings totally off the subject of the previous post.
Please answer the question. I'm sure if a state judge broke laws it would be all over the news. Since I can't seem to find it, perhaps you could take just a moment to send us in the right direction to find this pertinent information that seemed to miss every main news outlet in the nation and the world. Now would this info be on Randall Terry's website or 'Nobel Prize nominee' Hammesfahr's site?
See my post #722
Greer broke the law that all the other laws rest upon, clearly.
In fact, he is lawless...he makes it up as he goes along.
And the rest of the legal and political establishment refused to do a thing about it, because they could care less about the existence of the Constitution, either.
That is what you're defending.
Try reading the Constitution, if you're looking to understand the law.
Is my post #722 'valid' and 'well-thought out'? Is is a 'random ranting totally off the subject'?
Or do you all want to continue to pretend that the Constitution doesn't matter?