Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: KDD
"I am 100% sure that those who were charged with making that determination had clear and convincing evidence that she did not."

Really? You sat through the trial? Because if you didn't, and you make this statement, then you must not have the slightest idea what "clear and convincing evidence" is.

569 posted on 04/14/2005 1:30:50 PM PDT by lugsoul ("maybe those who are defending this judicial murder could be said to be WORSE than Nazis." - EV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul
Matters not whether I sat through the trial...I was not charged with finding clear and convincing evidence of anything relating to this case and neither were you.

I said...

"I am 100% sure that those who were charged with making that determination had clear and convincing evidence that she did not."

The outcome bears out my assertion.

If ya'll had your way and Congress established a "Public Court of Appeals"...even then I believe most people would not want to have to bear the existence that Terri did, nor would they demand others do so.
577 posted on 04/14/2005 1:43:12 PM PDT by KDD (just the facts please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson