I stated the applicable section of the 2DCA's opinion regarding Schiavo, guardians and conflicts. You have stated nothing except opinion, which you are entitled to but you're not entitled to crown yourself King of the Courts. Comprende'?
If you do not believe in a conspiracy that is a welcome difference from most of your allies.
A tacit admission that you lied to further what you see as your cause, whatever that may be.
You're being "impressed" would indicate great weakness in my argument and would not be welcome.
Friend, you don't have arguments, you have opinion, ad hominem and lies from what I've seen of our discussion.
I repeat, the 2DCA held that Schiavo had a conflcit therefore it was the states decision to kill Terri Schiavo. Florida law prohibits appointment of guardians who "may have a conflcit of interest".
If you've got a problem with my statement of the law or the facts back it up, if not I suggest you back off.
TS's guardian did not make the ultimate decision in this case thus his alleged bias is of no significance. That decision was made by the court following medical advice.
If you want to separate yourself from the Conspiracy Clique that is fine with me and in no way an admission of anything since I never accused you of anything.
There was no conflict when MS was appointed guardian and there was no reason to remove him even after this "conflict" supposedly developed. It is silly to suppose this court jumped through hoops at the behest of this non-entity as so many argue.