To: Spiff; Dane
But you've been using outright lies and dishonesty to do it and you've allied yourself with an admitted ACLU Democrat who is on a "jihad" to "beat up" conservatives and Republicans.
Why is it OK to attack Dane for his supposed "alliances" when you seem to beg for a pass every time someone uncovers something negative about the minutement or an allied group?
140 posted on
04/10/2005 9:28:10 AM PDT by
ClintonBeGone
(In politics, sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
To: ClintonBeGone
Why is it OK to attack Dane for his supposed "alliances" when you seem to beg for a pass every time someone uncovers something negative about the minutement or an allied group?Because you define groups to be 'allied' at the drop of a hat and with no justification.
146 posted on
04/10/2005 9:30:22 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Cleverly Arranging 1's And 0's Since 11110111011...)
To: ClintonBeGone
Why is it OK to attack Dane for his supposed "alliances" when you seem to beg for a pass every time someone uncovers something negative about the minutement or an allied group? Because Free Republic is littered with evidence of yours, Dane's, and Ficklin's alliance with harrowup in attacking the Minuteman Project with lies and slander. There is no evidence that Nethercott has anything to do with the Minuteman Project because he does not have anything to do with it. In fact, before the MMP started he actually said he was against it. Suddenly, in this article, he is reported by the leftist media outlet to "support" it.
165 posted on
04/10/2005 9:47:15 AM PDT by
Spiff
(Don't believe everything you think.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson