oh so it's ok when you do it, but those that disagree with you are violating the charter? i am sensing a double standard here. i have seen terri supporters referred to as TERRIBOTS on this thread that attempts to claim the moral highground. well which is it? i see several people attmepting to have a reasoned logical discusssion and they are being castigated rather than engaged. you have your thread, but you are fast losing the moral high ground.
Your response: oh so it's ok when you do it, but those that disagree with you are violating the charter? i am sensing a double standard here. i have seen terri supporters referred to as TERRIBOTS on this thread that attempts to claim the moral highground. well which is it? i see several people attmepting to have a reasoned logical discusssion and they are being castigated rather than engaged. you have your thread, but you are fast losing the moral high ground.
My response: They NEVER had the moral high ground! Just as was pointed out, by referring to themselves as the "coalition of the sane", anyone in disagreement is, by logical extension, "insane". Many of them have engaged in the very thing they decry, thus exposing their hypocrisy.