[malakhi]

comes down to someone's fundamental "due process" rights being disregarded by-to modify a popular liberal phrase-an imperial judiciary.

I have to disagree. The courts followed Florida law. The problem is the law, not judicial activism.

[Do not dub me shapka broham]

In my opinion, there is no state law that supersedes a duly authorized congressional action, or a clause in the United States Constitution.

I'm fully in support of "states rights", when the putatively state issue is being decided in a Constitutional manner.

However, I don't see how one state judge is able to contravene the direct orders of the U.S. Congress.

[hobbes1]

you keep repeating that but it isnt any truer now, than the first 20 times.


The fact is the US CONGRESS mandated a De Novo hearing in a Federal Court, and Greer, Whittemore, and the Other two judges basically said, "We dont feel like it so we aren't doing it"

[P_A_I]

test bump