Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Mo1

I understand, but was clarifying (in light of the parsing about "the father didn't say it, the attorney said it") that the Schindlers allowed their attorney to voice a characterization on their behalf and did not correct her. That's the same as if they had said it themselves.


I don't know what was disturbing about Felos' description, frankly. After he spoke the Schindlers and/or their spokespeople then basically echoed him to a degree (with some embellishments in the other direction about how she's "alert") so evidently he had spoken the truth.

The truth is not disturbing. Misrepresentations are.


1,987 posted on 03/30/2005 4:32:10 PM PST by cyncooper (I see pod people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1972 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
The truth is not disturbing. Misrepresentations are.

And how can anyone follow what the parents, et al, are saying?

One minute, she looks like someone from a concentration camp.

Next minute, she looks fine, alert, talking & ready to dance.

Any wonder why the courts have a hard time believing the Schindlers?

1,990 posted on 03/30/2005 4:38:09 PM PST by the Deejay ( I'LL RESPECT YOUR OPINION....IF YOU'LL RESPECT MINE.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1987 | View Replies ]

To: cyncooper
I don't know what was disturbing about Felos' description, frankly.

Well those are your beliefs and opinions .. which is your full right

I personally find Felos and his comments about this whole issue to be distrubing

2,035 posted on 03/30/2005 5:18:54 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1987 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson