Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Rheo

The source of the confusion is that, while now they say they wouldn't go that far, they did say they would go that far when they were on the stand.

Felos asked, (paraphrasing) "if she got gangrene in her legs, would you cut them off?" The answer was "yes" . Then he kept asking more gruesome scenarios and to each, the answer was "yes". I can't remember (brain is zzz) who was asked - I got the impression it was all of them, tho.

They got a lot of heat for it.

Since then, they have said they wouldn't take it that far.

I think they would amputate for gangrene. I don't think they'd do open heart surgery tho - just my personal feeling. I know they were against Karen Anne Quinlan being removed from her ventilator, even after all those years in that state. So, they definitely have very strict standards there.


2,165 posted on 03/25/2005 11:56:14 PM PST by Trinity_Tx (Since Oct 9, 2000..new nick) *From Buckhead to this in 6 months. That's one helluva FReefall*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2163 | View Replies ]


To: Trinity_Tx
They did change their stance on it, from testifying in court to when Wolfson discussed it with them...thank goodness.

Why are you still awake and posting??? :-)

2,167 posted on 03/26/2005 12:10:00 AM PST by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson