Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: SigPro2340
Looks like that was a gun case. In which case, I will gladly agree with Thomas on the gun issue.

Justice Thomas' was addressing the substantial effects doctrine in all its applications, not just guns.

I ask again, do you agree with Justice Thomas' comments about the substantial effects doctrine?

84 posted on 03/04/2005 11:37:16 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: Ken H

If Thomas was saying drugs were legal, I'd disagree. If he's talking about the 2nd amendment, I'll agree.


86 posted on 03/04/2005 11:39:10 PM PST by SigPro2340
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson